leadership vs. management

Leadership vs. management: what is the primary distinction between management and leadership? While social media is full of memes and ‘intellectual insights’ about these two roles, it is critical to appreciate the importance of both of these organizational personas and why any top-performing organization bolsters its ranks with both leaders and managers. We will discuss in this article how leaders and managers have very distinct abilities and qualities. This article will also delve into the most critical requirements for effective leadership and management.

Leadership Vs. Management: How Are They Different?
leadership vs. management

Leadership and management are functions that overlap. While this is true, the meanings of these two roles are distinct, and you should not use them interchangeably. Both denote a specific collection of functions, qualities, and talents with some overlap.

They do, however, differ significantly in some situations. Some managers, for example, do not practice leadership, while others lead without holding a managerial position.

A manager is someone who you choose or assign to a position within an organization. Most of the time, a manager is selected based on technical abilities, knowledge, and competence. The greatest leadership skill, on the other hand, is the ability to influence and inspire others.

It is critical to have excellent leaders and managers in the company. Organizations require good leaders to help them achieve their goals and vision. They also need good managers to make sure that things get done and that their employees are working toward the same goals as the company.

Leaders Set The Vision and Mission, Managers Execute It

Managers and leaders have varied duties for creating and executing a company’s mission and vision.

Visionaries are leaders. The majority of them have a clear idea of where they want their companies to go in the future. They are not, however, the only ones who are responsible for bringing that vision to life.

Managers have a critical role in this situation. Managers are accountable for keeping employees aligned with the fundamental corporate values and goals. At the same time, leaders are responsible for transferring the company’s mission, vision, and goals to the entire organization through effective leadership communication. However, 71% of employees say that they are not given enough attention to effective communication strategies.

Even though managers can persuade others to strive toward the same goals, many employees think that their company’s plans are not well communicated. Furthermore, employees expect to be kept up to date on their company’s performance and the direction it is headed towards.

As per HBS Dean Nitin Nohria in an interview for the online course Management Essentials: “I think of management as working with other people to make sure the goals an organization has articulated are executed. It is a process of working with others to ensure the effective execution of a chosen set of goals. Leadership is about developing what the goals should be. It’sIt’se about driving change.”

Furthermore, executives may develop trust in the workplace by speaking freely about the company’s prospects and issues. They can encourage employees to communicate their ideas, needs, and problems, resulting in a constructive atmosphere. The healthier the work environment grows, the more transparent leaders are.

Managers Think About Execution, Whereas Leaders Think About Ideas

While a managerial work ethic emphasizes logic and control, leaders are more concerned about improving the organization. They accomplish this by generating fresh ideas and promoting a forward-thinking mindset. In other words, managers are always looking for “how” and when” solutions, whereas leaders are looking for “what” and “why” answers.

As a result, the manager’s primary role is to carry out their responsibilities per the leader’s vision. Their key responsibility is to guarantee that people in various functions work efficiently and successfully and feel free to express themselves.

They should always watch the bottom line by controlling employees and providing necessary information, processes, workflows, and tools to enable employees’ success.

Managers relate to people according to their role in decision-making, while leaders, who are concerned with ideas, relate in more high-level but empathetic ways. The main difference is between a manager’s orientation to how things get done and a leader’s orientation to what should be done to achieve more significant results.

Leaders can play a critical role in fostering change because they are continually looking for fresh ideas. Furthermore, by empowering colleagues to strive toward common goals, a leader drives constructive, gradual change. Effective communication is a leader’s first powerful weapon for doing so.

Leaders’ team communication messages should prepare individuals to do things differently and explain why, while managers should reinforce these messages. Many managers, on the other hand, are entirely unaware of why a shift is taking place.

Leaders inspire people, and Managers Are Responsible for Their Success

While leaders can inspire others, managers are accountable for ensuring employees’ long-term success and a healthy work environment throughout their careers.

We hold managers responsible for the success and productivity of their teams because they account for over 70% of employee engagement in the workplace.

On the other hand, managers can do nothing to assist their employees in thriving if they are not inspired by what their leaders have to say. Leaders may motivate their workforce and gain their followers by building a personal leadership style through self-reflection, honest communication, and continual feedback.

According to studies, employees feel less anxious and under pressure when they have the opportunity to interact with their leaders daily. Furthermore, leadership has a significant impact on staff engagement.

Employees perform better in environments that encourage honest, open, and transparent communication. Many firms, however, continue to overlook the significance of two-way communication between leaders and employees. Instead, information transmission is in one direction, and employees are unable to participate in company-wide discussions.

Managers Work in the Present, While Leaders Look to the Future

One of the most significant distinctions between leaders and managers is that leaders are more future-oriented while managers are more present-oriented.

As a result, the manager’s first significant task is to achieve organizational goals by implementing budgeting, corporate structuring, and staffing processes and procedures. Leaders, on the other hand, are more likely to plan and seize future chances.

However, the leadership’s vision for the future is meaningless unless you can communicate it to both managers and employees openly and unambiguously.

Because a sense of purpose and the alignment of employees’ personal and professional values is one of the most critical drivers of employee engagement and experience, every leader should instill that sense of purpose in their employees.

Leaders shape culture, and Managers endorse it

Culture is a set of values, attitudes, and behaviors that define and decide how a company functions and how the work is accomplished. Employees and other stakeholders act and behave in ways that support and enable the attainment of company goals when organizational culture is aligned with the overall business strategy.

The difference between leadership and management in organizational culture is that leaders define and develop the culture, while managers lead their people to live according to that culture.

The leader’s responsibility is to uphold the organization’s values and principles through actions, authentic communication, and decisions. Passionate and motivating executives have a lot of effect on how the company’s purpose is communicated and how people behave.

Their abilities and leadership styles significantly impact how employees adopt and live the culture, while the manager’s responsibility is to consistently support and embrace the culture within the organization.

As a result, without collaboration between leadership and management, motivating people to live by the company’s standards and core values is impossible.

Counting Value vs. Creating Value

These are two different things. If you are in charge of people, you’re probably counting rather than adding value. Managers only count value; some even reduce value by disabling those who add it. His supervisor depletes value by distracting a diamond cutter from reporting how many stones he has cut every 15 minutes.

On the other hand, leaders focus on producing value, stating things like, “I’d prefer you to handle A while I deal with B. They provide value in addition to what the team produces, and they are just as much of a value producer as their followers. The hallmarks of action-based leadership include leading by example and enabling others.

Circles of Power vs. Circles of Influence

Managers build circles of authority, while leaders create circles of influence, much as they do with their subordinates and followers.

Counting the number of people outside your reporting hierarchy who come to you for guidance is the easiest method to determine which of the two you belong to. The more you do, the more likely you are to be considered a leader.

Areas of Management and Leadership Collision

Even though a company’s leadership and management roles may differ, there are numerous places where their responsibilities and tasks overlap. The three primary areas are as follows:


Leadership and management communication are both essential for an organization’s ongoing success. As previously said, employees demand to be informed and educated on where their firm stands and where it is headed.

While leadership communication should excite people, consistent and clear management communication encourages employees to accomplish their best work and strengthen team relationships.

Problem-solving and Decision-making

Both the manager and the leader are responsible for successful decision-making and problem-solving. While firm leaders are in charge of making decisions, managers make decisions at the team or departmental level.

Change and Crisis Management

In the same way that decision-making requires collaboration, leaders and managers should work together during times of change or crisis. The current global situation has taught us the value of agile workplace transformation and the necessity of rapid change adaptation. While leaders may have a greater awareness of the change that must be made, managers better understand how to help their staff embrace and align with the change.

Management is concerned with dealing with or regulating things and people, whereas leadership involves directing others toward a common purpose.

The following are the top ten management skills:

  • Personality traits
  • Communication
  • Motivation
  • Organization
  • Delegation
  • Planning ahead of time
  • Thinking in terms of strategy
  • Problem-solving
  • Commercial awareness
  • Mentoring

The top ten leadership skills:

  • Communication
  • Motivation
  • Delegation
  • Positivity
  • Trustworthiness
  • Creativity
  • Feedback
  • Responsibility
  • Commitment
  • Flexibility

With the right technology, you can empower your managers and leaders.

Leaders and managers face new obstacles in the workplace due to the increase of remote work, a scattered workforce, and social distancing constraints.

The fundamental goal of today’s organizations is to keep their dispersed staff connected, inspired, and engaged, even when they are physically separated. They also need to promptly reach all employees with vital information on any device, regardless of where they are.

Ad: PlayAblo’s Enterprise-Grade Micro-Learning platform is built for the corporate learner. Micro-Learning, along with assessments and gamification features, ensures learning outcome measurement along with sustained engagement.
Find out more and request a custom demo!

Fortunately, modern employee tools and technology can help with these issues. Managers and leaders can use the employee training platform PlayAblo to:

  • Encourage two-way communication in the workplace.
  • Create material that is both entertaining and motivating about their company.
  • Segment internal audiences to offer content depending on the needs, preferences, job roles, and locations of employees, among other factors.
  • Allow for mobile-first communication in the workplace.
  • Reach out to all employees, even those without a specific work area, as soon as possible.
  • Allow employees to express themselves.
  • Employees should be encouraged to become brand ambassadors.
  • Assess the influence of workplace communication on the overall success of the company.

If you are researching a powerful workplace learning tool, arrange a PlayAblo LMS demo to learn how other companies utilize it to create an excellent employee training experience.

Ad: PlayAblo’s Enterprise-Grade Micro-Learning platform is built for the corporate learner. Micro-Learning, along with assessments and gamification features, ensures learning outcome measurement along with sustained engagement.
Find out more and request a custom demo!

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.